Skip to content
Yale Architecture YSoA
Search

Student Work

Student Work

All images
Filter by
All Programs
P.h.D.M.E.D.M.Arch. IIM.Arch I
Plan drawing by Laura Quan.
Exploded axonometric drawing by Audrey Yifei Li.
Plan drawing by Timon Covelli.
Exterior perspective by Spencer Fried.
Final model by John Holden.
Aerial view of model by James Coleman.
Study model by Dylan Weiser.
Physical model by David Langdon.
Site model by Xiaomeng Li.
Plan drawings by Tara Marchelewicz.
Model by Ronald Ostezan.
Model view by Pierre Thach.
Elevation drawing by Danielle Schwartz.
Rendering by Winston Yuen.
Oblique plan by Samantha Monge Kaser.
Rendering by Jennifer Lai.
Physical model by Ethan Zisson.
Model by Melissa Weigel.
Model by Kerry Garikes.
Site model by Pik-Tone Fung.
Rendered aerial view by Melissa Russell.
Plan and section drawing by Haylie Chan.
Perspective by Ryan Hughes.
Model view by Iven Peh.
Next Page
Loading in progress
Yale Architecture
Search
Yale Architecture
Search
  • Academics
    • Overview
    • M.Arch I
    • M.Arch II
    • M.E.D.
    • Ph.D.
    • Joint-degree Programs
    • Undergraduate Studies
    • The Jim Vlock First Year Building Project
    • Student Travel
    • Awards and Fellowships
    • Explore all Courses
  • Admissions
    • Overview
    • Requirements
    • Tuition and Fees
    • Financial Aid
    • International Students
  • Calendar
    • Events
    • Academic Calendar
    • Exhibitions
  • Publications
    • Overview
    • Perspecta
    • Retrospecta
    • Constructs
    • Books
  • About the School
    • Overview
    • History and Objectives
    • News
    • Tribal Lands Acknowledgement
    • Yale Urban Design Workshop
    • Yale Center for Ecosystems in Architecture
    • Fabrication Labs
    • Advanced Technology
    • Staff
    • Visiting
    • Contact
  • Faculty
    • Explore all Faculty
    • Endowed Professorships
  • Students
    • Student Affairs
    • Recent Graduates
    • Student Work
    • Student Groups
    • Career Development
  • Alumni
    • Overview
  • All Images
  • Forms and Resources
  • Make a Gift
  • School Policies
  • Jobs at YSoA
  • Accreditation Information
Yale logo
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Accessibility
  • Land Acknowledgement
  • Public Safety
  • Colophon
  • Yale University
Loading in progress

Student Work

Drawing by Adil Mansure
Drawing by Adil Mansure
1∕2

Title

Teleologies of the architectural surface via Borromini

Authors
Adil Mansure

Course
The Architectural Surface: Figure, Form, Ambiance

Project Description

This suggests an open, proto-parametric logical system that can sustain the constant redefinition of form, space, volume, order and meaning. This openness also anticipates that not every aspect of the church would be worked out completely in any given stage of its evolution. Such a system produces generative potential and compels architectural innovation in most unlikely realms. This type of openness would only be conceptualized in logic and mathematics later in the 17th century by figures like Gottfried Leibniz.

In the algorithm, as the column diameter attains a particular value, it leads to the elimination of a set of columns. Inversely, the columns are willed into existence by values of specific parameters rather than only classical principles of columns. On further increasing the values of the diameter, the remaining pairs of columns coalesce into apses and the lozenge morphs into a lobed octagon—the first figure drawn by Borromini. The interchangeability of the elements redefines their fundamental genetic properties and their functional/structural roles in the scheme.

These modifications were driven by questions of urbanity and the building site; and also by intensive formal properties of columns and apses. By reverse engineering the code implicit, a pseudo-algorithmic intuition in Borromini’s design process and thinking emerges. His artistic intelligence itself functioned algorithmically and parametrically. With animated algorithms, not only can all the possible iterations and generative potential in the design process be computed but also visualized. The animations represent a form of spatial dynamism that is created not only by rhythmic elements on a surface but as a result of a kinetic design process manifest spatially as affectively instable, fragile and tenuous conditions of the architectural surface.