Skip to content
Yale Architecture YSoA
Search

Student Work

Student Work

All images
Filter by
All Programs
P.h.D.M.E.D.M.Arch. IIM.Arch I
Schematic drawing for Inflata-box.
Visual output of computer program.
Project by James Schwartz.
Model by Valeria Flores.
The Topographic Maps between Yichang and Chongqing, 1936
Detail of “Close Combat Course”; Sketch to Accompany Inclosure 2 in 353.01/61–GnGTC (2-4-43); H.Q. A.G.F. to all Commanding Generals (February, 4 1943) “Subject: Special Battle Courses”; Training Directives; Background Files: “Military Training in WWII” 1939-1945; Record Group 319, National Archives Building, College Park, M.D.
Julian Beck, Poster for Six Public Acts with Map of Pittsburgh as Background, 1975. Living Theatre Records, Beinecke Archives and Manuscripts Library.
Concrete swatch in a Louis Kahn building.
Philosophical object by Gentley Smith.
Overview of sample neighborhood design.
Perspective drawing.
Grid of props.
Painted wall.
Drawing by Liwei Wang and Haylie Chan.
Publication on Whitehall in London.
Model of a formal garden by Jamie Edindjiklian.
Watercolor frieze by Gina Cannistra.
Diagram of pollutant mediation strategies.
Map of Connecticut.
Rendering by Daniel Glick-Unterman and Pierre Thach.
Rendering by Ian Donaldson and Radhika Singh.
Rendering of Boston City Hall Plaza with new intervention.
Physical model.
Model by Ava Amirahmadi.
Next Page
Loading in progress
Yale Architecture
Search
Yale Architecture
Search
  • Academics
    • Overview
    • M.Arch I
    • M.Arch II
    • M.E.D.
    • Ph.D.
    • Joint-degree Programs
    • Undergraduate Studies
    • The Jim Vlock First Year Building Project
    • Student Travel
    • Awards and Fellowships
    • Explore all Courses
  • Admissions
    • Overview
    • Requirements
    • Tuition and Fees
    • Financial Aid
    • International Students
  • Calendar
    • Events
    • Academic Calendar
    • Exhibitions
  • Publications
    • Overview
    • Perspecta
    • Retrospecta
    • Constructs
    • Books
  • About the School
    • Overview
    • History and Objectives
    • News
    • Tribal Lands Acknowledgement
    • Yale Urban Design Workshop
    • Yale Center for Ecosystems in Architecture
    • Fabrication Labs
    • Advanced Technology
    • Staff
    • Visiting
    • Contact
  • Faculty
    • Explore all Faculty
    • Endowed Professorships
  • Students
    • Student Affairs
    • Recent Graduates
    • Student Work
    • Student Groups
    • Career Development
  • Alumni
    • Overview
  • All Images
  • Forms and Resources
  • Make a Gift
  • School Policies
  • Jobs at YSoA
  • Accreditation Information
Yale logo
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Accessibility
  • Land Acknowledgement
  • Public Safety
  • Colophon
  • Yale University
Loading in progress

Student Work

Drawing by Adil Mansure
Drawing by Adil Mansure
1∕2

Title

Teleologies of the architectural surface via Borromini

Authors
Adil Mansure

Course
The Architectural Surface: Figure, Form, Ambiance

Project Description

This suggests an open, proto-parametric logical system that can sustain the constant redefinition of form, space, volume, order and meaning. This openness also anticipates that not every aspect of the church would be worked out completely in any given stage of its evolution. Such a system produces generative potential and compels architectural innovation in most unlikely realms. This type of openness would only be conceptualized in logic and mathematics later in the 17th century by figures like Gottfried Leibniz.

In the algorithm, as the column diameter attains a particular value, it leads to the elimination of a set of columns. Inversely, the columns are willed into existence by values of specific parameters rather than only classical principles of columns. On further increasing the values of the diameter, the remaining pairs of columns coalesce into apses and the lozenge morphs into a lobed octagon—the first figure drawn by Borromini. The interchangeability of the elements redefines their fundamental genetic properties and their functional/structural roles in the scheme.

These modifications were driven by questions of urbanity and the building site; and also by intensive formal properties of columns and apses. By reverse engineering the code implicit, a pseudo-algorithmic intuition in Borromini’s design process and thinking emerges. His artistic intelligence itself functioned algorithmically and parametrically. With animated algorithms, not only can all the possible iterations and generative potential in the design process be computed but also visualized. The animations represent a form of spatial dynamism that is created not only by rhythmic elements on a surface but as a result of a kinetic design process manifest spatially as affectively instable, fragile and tenuous conditions of the architectural surface.