Skip to content
Yale Architecture YSoA
Search

Student Work

Student Work

All images
Filter by
All Programs
P.h.D.M.E.D.M.Arch. IIM.Arch I
Drawing by Vivian Tsai.
IPMS drawing by Jacob Schaffert.
Perspective by Ilana Simhon.
Perspective by Daniel Marty.
Perspective by Garrett Hardee.
Drawing by Jeremy Leonard, Gordon Schissler, and Madison Sembler.
Perspective by Ethan Fischer and Feng Qian.
Perspective by Paul Lorenz.
Perspective by Matthew Bohne.
Plan drawing by Heather Bizon.
Physical model by Samuel King.
Perspective by Matthew Zuckerman.
Perspective by Jennifer Fontenot.
Axonometric drawing by Alexander Stagge and Chad Greenlee.
Axonometric section drawings by Robert Hon and Wesley Hiatt.
Physical model by Rachel Gamble Boyd.
Section drawing by Nasim Rowshanabadi.
Plan drawing by Daniel Glick-Unterman.
Section perspective by Istvan van Vianen and Minquan Wang.
Urban plan by Xiao Tan and Liyang Wang.
Perspective view by Nadeen Safa and Aslan Taheri.
Plan and section drawing by Jack Lipson.
Diagram by Claire Haugh.
Axonometric drawing by Margaret Marsh.
Next Page
Loading in progress
Yale Architecture
Search
Yale Architecture
Search
  • Academics
    • Overview
    • M.Arch I
    • M.Arch II
    • M.E.D.
    • Ph.D.
    • Joint-degree Programs
    • Undergraduate Studies
    • The Jim Vlock First Year Building Project
    • Student Travel
    • Awards and Fellowships
    • Explore all Courses
  • Admissions
    • Overview
    • Requirements
    • Tuition and Fees
    • Financial Aid
    • International Students
  • Calendar
    • Events
    • Academic Calendar
    • Exhibitions
  • Publications
    • Overview
    • Perspecta
    • Retrospecta
    • Constructs
    • Books
  • About the School
    • Overview
    • History and Objectives
    • News
    • Tribal Lands Acknowledgement
    • Yale Urban Design Workshop
    • Yale Center for Ecosystems in Architecture
    • Fabrication Labs
    • Advanced Technology
    • Staff
    • Visiting
    • Contact
  • Faculty
    • Explore all Faculty
    • Endowed Professorships
  • Students
    • Student Affairs
    • Recent Graduates
    • Student Work
    • Student Groups
    • Career Development
  • Alumni
    • Overview
  • All Images
  • Forms and Resources
  • Make a Gift
  • School Policies
  • Jobs at YSoA
  • Accreditation Information
Yale logo
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Accessibility
  • Land Acknowledgement
  • Public Safety
  • Colophon
  • Yale University
Loading in progress

Student Work

How to own your own home: A handbook for prospective home-owners (1924)
How to own your own home: A handbook for prospective home-owners (1924)
School cottages for training in home-making (1925). Girls were trained in home-making by home economics teachers as a way of making them more effective in their unwaged domestic duties.
School cottages for training in home-making (1925). Girls were trained in home-making by home economics teachers as a way of making them more effective in their unwaged domestic duties.
Boy-Built Houses (1927). Whereas girls were trained to participate in the informal sphere of unwaged domestic production, boys were trained to approach the home as a “house”. The house would need to be built, maintained, appraised and purchased, and these were the ways that the boy trained to relate.
Boy-Built Houses (1927). Whereas girls were trained to participate in the informal sphere of unwaged domestic production, boys were trained to approach the home as a “house”. The house would need to be built, maintained, appraised and purchased, and these were the ways that the boy trained to relate.
The idealized American house as a news worth spreading on the cover of Better Housing, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1934).
The idealized American house as a news worth spreading on the cover of Better Housing, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1934).
1∕4

Title

The New Deal and ‘The Economy

Authors
Eric Rogers

Course
Independent M.E.D. Research

Project Description

The present study re-evaluates the Progressive era in the United States from the standpoint of capitalist reproduction, yet does so in a way that ultimately transcends Marxist economic determinism. It considers the ways in which ‘progressive’ discourses problematized urban issues in such a way that these shaped knowledges and subjectivities which were instrumental in the shaping of the American metropolis during the period between 1894 and 1950. The city, and its physical features, operated as an interface between actors and the abstract aggregation of their actions in what would eventually be conceptualized as “the economy”. This study considers how the built environment, which served as such an interface, also was problematized as a site for economic, social and political intervention. This urban discourse in which these problematizations occurred is the protagonist of the thesis, since it is within that discourse that knowledge and subjectivity seem to have formed.

Tags
MED Program Eeva-Liisa Pelkonen Urbanism Peggy Deamer Housing Keller Easterling MED Thesis